Onpode
Cover art for Blockchain.com joins major crypto firms testing U.S. prediction market platforms

Blockchain.com joins major crypto firms testing U.S. prediction market platforms

October 14, 2026 · 9 min

Eliza Ward & Brian Reed

Blockchain.com filed for CFTC DCM and FCM licenses on October 9, targeting U.S. prediction markets and perpetual futures — but a federal license has not stopped Nevada from issuing a cease-and-desist to Kalshi or Baltimore from suing both Kalshi and Polymarket. The NFL-Kalshi case, still unresolved, could determine whether any DCM holder holds exclusive federal jurisdiction.

Blockchain.com, a cryptocurrency platform founded in 2011, announced on October 9, 2026 that it had applied to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for two regulatory authorizations: a Designated Contract Market (DCM) license and a Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) registration.

0:008:58
Get the next episode on Crypto →

Follow it free — new episodes land in your feed.

Or make your own — any topic, in minutes

More Onpode episodes on Crypto →

About this episode

Blockchain.com filed for two CFTC licenses on October 9th — a Designated Contract Market license and a Futures Commission Merchant license — to offer prediction markets and crypto derivatives to U.S. customers. The filing is real. So is everything that makes it complicated. The episode starts with a simple question: if Blockchain.com already runs prediction products internationally, what does the U.S. filing actually change? The answer is legal standing — the right to serve American retail and institutional customers without exposure. But the episode quickly turns to what that standing is actually worth right now. Kalshi already holds a CFTC DCM license. Nevada issued them a cease-and-desist anyway. Baltimore sued both Kalshi and Polymarket in August 2026 under local consumer protection law. The federal license didn't stop either action. It got you into the room where the fight is happening — not out of it. There's also a structural contradiction the episode traces carefully: a 2024 federal ruling said the CFTC overstepped when it blocked Kalshi's election contracts, while a 2025 ruling affirmed Nevada's jurisdiction on sports contracts. Both are federal. Both stand. And the CFTC is currently submitting new rules to the White House specifically to cement authority it hasn't fully secured. The case to watch is NFL v. Kalshi. It determines whether any DCM holder can claim exclusive federal jurisdiction over sports-event contracts — which is where most of the volume lives. Until that's resolved, every pending application, Blockchain.com's included, is building on unsettled ground.

Frequently asked

Why is Blockchain.com filing for CFTC licenses if it already offers prediction markets internationally?

Blockchain.com's existing prediction market and perpetual futures products, built through partnerships with Polymarket and Hyperliquid, are available only to international users. Filing for CFTC DCM and FCM licenses on October 9 is the legal step required to serve U.S. retail and institutional customers inside its app.

Does a CFTC DCM license protect a prediction market platform from state lawsuits?

A CFTC DCM license does not shield prediction market platforms from state enforcement. Kalshi holds a federal DCM license, yet Nevada issued it a cease-and-desist over sports event contracts in November 2025, and in August 2026 Baltimore sued both Kalshi and Polymarket under local consumer protection law.

Which crypto companies are already licensed to offer prediction markets in the U.S.?

At least six companies received CFTC DCM licenses in 2026, including Coinbase, Crypto.com, Gemini Space Station, and Robinhood. Coinbase distributes prediction products through a Kalshi partnership rather than holding its own DCM license, while Blockchain.com is pursuing direct licensing.

What is the NFL vs. Kalshi case and why does it matter for U.S. prediction markets?

NFL v. Kalshi is a pending federal case, with the Supreme Court watching it, that could determine whether sports-event contracts are federally regulated swaps subject to exclusive CFTC jurisdiction. Its outcome would affect every DCM holder — including Blockchain.com — seeking to offer sports prediction markets to U.S. customers.

How large is the U.S. prediction market and who is currently trading?

Kalshi and Polymarket together processed nearly six billion dollars in weekly volume as of 2026. Much of that volume is offshore or accessed via VPN, since Polymarket officially blocks U.S. users under its CFTC settlement — the customers Blockchain.com wants to capture already exist and are already trading.

Grounded in 12 sources
Blockchain.com files for CFTC licenses to offer U.S. crypto derivatives and prediction markets ↗ · cnbc.com
Blockchain.com Seeks Approval for US Prediction Markets and Crypto Derivatives ↗ · finance.yahoo.com
What Does Coinbase Global (COIN) Entering Australian Stocks And Derivatives Mean? ↗ · finance.yahoo.com
Event Contracts and Crypto Derivatives: Blockchain.com's ... ↗ · blockeditorial.com
Blockchain.com Latest Big Crypto Name to Try Hand in U.S. Prediction Markets - Casino.org ↗ · casino.org
Federal judge sides with Kalshi, blocks new Illinois rules on prediction markets - Chicago Sun-Times ↗ · chicago.suntimes.com
State of Crypto: Kalshi and Prediction Markets Face a Setback ↗ · coindesk.com
Blockchain.com Pushes for Prediction Markets and Crypto Derivatives Trading in the US ↗ · coingape.com
Blockchain.com Seeks CFTC Approval To Launch US Prediction Markets And Crypto Derivatives | Crowdfund Insider ↗ · crowdfundinsider.com
Baltimore Takes On Kalshi and Polymarket, Pulling Coinbase Into the Fight - Crypto Economy ↗ · crypto-economy.com
Blockchain.com - Wikipedia ↗ · en.wikipedia.org
Blockchain.com’s U.S. Trading Plan Enters CFTC Review - Gaming America ↗ · gamingamerica.com
Read transcript

Brian Reed: Hey. Did you get a chance to look at the Blockchain.com news before we started?

Eliza Ward: I did, yeah. October 9th, CFTC filing — DCM and FCM, both.

Brian Reed: The part I don't get initially — I mean, they're already live internationally. Polymarket partnership for event contracts, Hyperliquid for perp futures. So what does this filing actually change?

Eliza Ward: That's actually the cleanest way into this. What changes is: U.S. customers. Right now those products are for international users. The CFTC license is how you get authorization to run that same venue for Americans, inside the app, without a legal grenade waiting for you.

Brian Reed: So it's the difference between — okay, think of a contractor who's been doing great work in other countries. This is them applying for the domestic license to operate locally.

Eliza Ward: Wait — yeah, that's close. I'd say it more like: food truck running abroad, applying for the brick-and-mortar permit at home. Same kitchen, same recipes. The filing isn't about capability. It's about standing — legal standing to serve U.S. retail and institutional customers through their app.

Brian Reed: And Peter Smith is doing this right now, while the regulatory ground is... let's call it unsettled.

Eliza Ward: That is a generous way to put it.

Brian Reed: And that 'unsettled' part is worth sitting with, because — the headline makes this sound like Blockchain.com is breaking new ground. They're not. At least 12 companies filed for DCM licenses in 2026 alone. The CFTC approved six of them.

Eliza Ward: Coinbase. Crypto.com. Gemini Space Station. Robinhood. All already offering regulated prediction products in the U.S.

Brian Reed: So this is not a pioneer story.

Eliza Ward: No. But — the interesting part is that Coinbase is doing this through a Kalshi partnership. They're not filing their own DCM. They're distributing Kalshi's products. Blockchain.com is doing the opposite — they want to own the license directly.

Brian Reed: Right, and that divergence is actually... I mean, that's the tell, isn't it. If you partner, you get the product. If you file your own DCM, you get the regulatory instrument itself. Those are different goals.

Eliza Ward: One is a product distribution play. The other is a shelter play.

Brian Reed: And this market is — wait, nearly six billion dollars in weekly volume across Kalshi and Polymarket as of 2026. That's the scale they're trying to get licensed access to.

Eliza Ward: Six billion weekly is real. That's not hype anymore. But most of that volume is offshore or behind a VPN — Polymarket officially blocks U.S. users. So the license isn't chasing a hypothetical market. It's chasing customers who already exist and are already trading, just without federal cover. That's what Blockchain.com actually wants to capture.

Brian Reed: But that's the part I want to slow down on — because the framing going around is that the CFTC license is how you solve the legal risk. Get federal approval, you're covered. And I don't think that's right.

Eliza Ward: It's not right. Kalshi already has that license. The CFTC-registered DCM. And in November 2025, a federal court said Nevada's Gaming Control Board still had jurisdiction over Kalshi's sports event contracts. The federal license did not close that door.

Brian Reed: A cease-and-desist. Nevada issued a cease-and-desist to Kalshi.

Eliza Ward: Correct. And then — I mean, this is the one that actually lands hard — August 2026, Baltimore. Mayor Brandon Scott and the City Council filed consumer protection lawsuits against Kalshi and Polymarket both. Alleging the sports-event contracts are unlicensed gambling under local law. Kalshi has a federal license. Didn't matter.

Brian Reed: So the CFTC license is — what, worthless?

Eliza Ward: Not worthless. But not a shield either — those are actually different things. The license gets you standing to operate. It does not preempt Nevada. It did not stop Baltimore. And Blockchain.com is filing into that exact same gap.

Brian Reed: So think about — okay, actual person. Trader in Nevada downloads the Blockchain.com app the day it launches federally approved event contracts. Their state has already told Kalshi it can't operate there. What happens to that account?

Eliza Ward: Mid-fight. Account frozen, holding a position mid-fight. And actually — wait, there's one more piece. Polymarket officially blocks U.S. users, that's the CFTC settlement. But Polymarket is currently Blockchain.com's international partner for event contracts. If Blockchain.com gets U.S. approval, what happens to that relationship? That's unresolved. And the jurisdictional question underneath all of this — the NFL case against Kalshi is still pending, Supreme Court is watching it, and the CFTC literally just sent the White House new rules trying to cement authority it hasn't fully locked in yet.

Brian Reed: The license doesn't answer the question. It just moves you into the room where the question is being fought.

Eliza Ward: And that's the room where the NFL case lives. NFL versus Kalshi — Supreme Court is watching it, still unresolved — and that one decides whether sports-event contracts are federally regulated swaps at all. Which is... I mean, that's the entire floor Blockchain.com is building on.

Brian Reed: Right, what about the CFTC's own move here — they sent new rules to the White House specifically to cement exclusive federal authority. Which, if you actually sit with that — why would they need to do that if they already had it?

Eliza Ward: They wouldn't.

Brian Reed: The agency is filing paperwork to claim ground it doesn't actually hold yet. And Blockchain.com's application is sitting in the queue while that's happening. So — let me see if I have this right — there are two contradictory federal data points already. A 2024 ruling that said the CFTC overstepped by blocking Kalshi's election contracts. And the November 2025 ruling that said Nevada still has jurisdiction on sports. Both federal. Both real. Neither one erases the other.

Eliza Ward: No confirmed approval timeline for Blockchain.com's DCM or FCM, by the way. The venue isn't operational. The application is pending into that contradiction.

Brian Reed: And then — wait, this is the part I wasn't expecting — Kalshi and Polymarket have both launched perpetual futures. Moved straight into crypto's core trading category. So Blockchain.com is pushing into prediction markets from the crypto side, and the prediction market platforms are pushing into perps from theirs. They're importing each other's legal exposure.

Eliza Ward: Which means the boundary question isn't just federal versus state anymore. It's — actually, no, the sharper version is: what regulator even owns this product once it's a perpetual future AND an event contract? SEC? CFTC? Nevada? Baltimore's city attorneys?

Brian Reed: So the thing to actually watch is the NFL-Kalshi outcome. That one sets whether any DCM holder can claim exclusive federal cover on sports contracts — which is most of the volume.

Eliza Ward: And the CFTC's White House submission. If those rules get blocked or returned, the agency's authority claim weakens — and every pending DCM application, Blockchain.com's included, is suddenly worth less than the day it was filed.

Brian Reed: And there's no confirmed approval timeline on Blockchain.com's applications — DCM or FCM — which means they're just... sitting in that contradiction. Indefinitely. I mean, the CFTC can't even tell you when they'll answer.

Eliza Ward: So here's what I actually think right now. If Blockchain.com gets approved — and that's still an if — watch the clock from launch day. If Nevada or a city files within 90 days, the federal license bought them visibility, not shelter. That's the test.

Brian Reed: Ninety days. That's — yeah, that's a real number to hold onto. Because Baltimore moved on Kalshi and Polymarket fast. August 2026, no long runway.

Eliza Ward: And none of it resolves without the NFL case. That's the one that actually answers whether any DCM holder — Kalshi, Blockchain.com, whoever's next — can claim exclusive federal jurisdiction on sports contracts. We don't have that answer.

Blockchain.com joins major crypto firms testing U.S. prediction market platforms · Onpode