Onpode
Cover art for Brent Spiner just announced Disney is developing a new animated Gargoyles series

Brent Spiner just announced Disney is developing a new animated Gargoyles series

August 8, 2026 · 9 min

Eliza Ward & Brian Reed

Brent Spiner, who voiced Puck in Disney's original Gargoyles (1994–1997), said on his podcast that he'd been told Disney Television Animation is developing a new animated series — but Disney Kids and Family has issued no confirmation, no creative team has been named, and series creator Greg Weisman has not been mentioned.

Actor Brent Spiner, who voiced the character Puck in the original Gargoyles animated series, stated on his podcast "Dropping Names with Brent and Jonny" that Disney Television Animation (TVA) is developing a new animated Gargoyles series.

0:009:24
Get the next episode on Media deep dive live action sitcoms and cartoons

Follow it free — new episodes land in your feed.

Or make your own — any topic, in minutes

More Onpode episodes on Media deep dive live action sitcoms and cartoons

About this episode

When Brent Spiner mentioned on his podcast that Disney Television Animation is developing a new Gargoyles animated series, the internet treated it as a confirmation. This episode argues it isn't — and that the gap between 'an actor heard something' and 'a show is greenlit' matters more than the headline suggests. The episode traces exactly what Spiner said (secondhand, no team attached, no Disney statement), then pulls back to ask why nobody is talking about the live-action Gargoyles project that Hollywood Reporter and Variety reported in October 2023 — Gary Dauberman, James Wan's company, Disney+. That project hasn't been cancelled. It also hasn't moved publicly in two and a half years. Spiner even distinguished the two, which means both are real enough for him to know the difference. From there, the episode gets into what would actually make this revival work versus what would quietly hollow it out. A Mondo licensing deal signals Disney thinks the IP is commercially live right now. But the one name that would tell you whether this is a genuine continuation — creator Greg Weisman, the architect of the serialized storytelling that kept the fanbase together for thirty years — hasn't appeared anywhere near this project. That absence, the episode argues, is the most important signal of all.

Frequently asked

Did Disney officially confirm a new Gargoyles animated series?

Disney has not officially confirmed a new Gargoyles animated series. The only public statement came from Brent Spiner, who voiced Puck in the original 1994–1997 run, saying on his podcast Dropping Names that he'd been told Disney Television Animation is developing one. Disney Kids and Family has issued no statement.

What did Brent Spiner say about the Gargoyles revival?

Brent Spiner said on his podcast Dropping Names with Brent and Jonny that he had been told Disney Television Animation is developing a new animated Gargoyles series. He also specified it is separate from the previously reported live-action Gary Dauberman project. He did not announce a creative team, timeline, or his own involvement.

Is Greg Weisman involved in the new Gargoyles series?

Greg Weisman, creator of the original 1994–1997 Gargoyles and architect of its serialized continuity, has not been named in connection with any new animated series. His absence from all reporting and announcements is considered a key signal — his involvement would indicate a true continuation rather than an IP reboot.

Is there also a live-action Gargoyles project in development?

Yes. Hollywood Reporter and Variety both reported in October 2023 that a live-action Gargoyles project for Disney+ was in development, with writer Gary Dauberman and James Wan's production company attached. As of mid-2026, no update — cancellation or continuation — has been announced. Brent Spiner explicitly said the animated project he mentioned is separate from this.

What is Disney Kids and Family, and would it oversee a new Gargoyles series?

Disney Kids and Family is the division — renamed from Disney Branded Television in June 2026 under executives Debra O'Connell and Ayo Davis — that would own any new animated Gargoyles project. The division has made no statement about Gargoyles despite Brent Spiner's comments, and that silence is the clearest indicator the project has not been greenlit.

Grounded in 11 sources
Disney+ Officially Seals the Fate of 25-Year-Old Animated Classic Reboot After 4 Seasons · cbr.com
CBR publishes “Disney Officially Revives 32-Year-Old Cult-Favorite Gargoyles” analysis. · cbr.com
Cartoon Network Exec Teases More Sequels of Classic Shows Possible Instead of Reboots · comicbook.com
Disney's Gargoyles Star Confirms Revival Series - ComicBook.com · comicbook.com
Disney Branded Television Changes Name To Disney Kids & Family · deadline.com
Disney Renews Adventure Time: Side Quests for Season 2 Weeks After Debut Topped Charts · easternherald.com
Gargoyles (TV series) - Wikipedia · en.wikipedia.org
Disney’s GARGOYLES Star Confirms a New Animated Revival Series is in the Works! — GeekTyrant · geektyrant.com
GeekVibesNation reports “Disney’s Gargoyles May Finally Be Coming Back After 30 Years.” · geekvibesnation.com
Gargoyles: Live Action TV Show Reboot in the Works at Disney+ · hollywoodreporter.com
New Disney CEO Josh D'Amaro Reveals Key Priorities in First Staff Memo | Future Plans & Vision (2026) · marylouputman.com
Read transcript

Brian Reed: Hey — okay, so I've been sitting with this Gargoyles thing for about an hour and I'm still not sure if it's news or if it's a podcast comment that got away from itself.

Eliza Ward: Both, probably. What happened is pretty small. What people made of it is — bigger.

Brian Reed: Walk me through what actually happened, because I want to make sure I'm reading this right.

Eliza Ward: Brent Spiner — Puck in the original 1994 Gargoyles run — is on his podcast Dropping Names with Brent and Jonny. He says, essentially, he had been told Disney Television Animation is developing a new animated series. That's it. No Disney confirmation, no details, no creative team.

Brian Reed: Had been told. Not 'I'm doing it,' not 'they called me.' Just — someone told him.

Eliza Ward: Secondhand. His word. But — he also did something that made people pay attention. He explicitly said this is different from the live-action version. The Gary Dauberman project. Separate thing.

Brian Reed: So he knew enough about the two tracks to distinguish them. Which is — I mean, that's not nothing.

Eliza Ward: It's not nothing. It's also not a greenlight. Gargoyles ran from 1994 to 1997, it has a real devoted following, and this is the biggest news in years — because an actor mentioned it on a podcast.

Brian Reed: Right — but 'secondhand from someone in the room' is just picture someone who worked on a show and a friend at the studio mentions a project in passing over drinks. That's the category of information this is. Not a press release. Not a greenlight.

Eliza Ward: That's exactly the right frame. A credible insider signal and a confirmed production are — they're not the same thing. One means something is probably being discussed. The other means there's a budget and a team.

Brian Reed: And Spiner said nothing about a team. No timeline, no — I mean, no writer, no showrunner, no Greg Weisman, nothing.

Eliza Ward: Disney Kids and Family — renamed from Disney Branded Television in June 2026, Debra O'Connell and Ayo Davis sent the note to creative partners — that's the division that would own this project. They have said nothing.

Brian Reed: Nothing at all?

Eliza Ward: Zero. And that's — wait, that's actually the data point. Not Spiner's comment. The silence from Disney Kids and Family is the story. Because if this were further along, someone there would have either confirmed it or killed it by now.

Brian Reed: So the headline is 'Gargoyles revival confirmed' and the actual confirmed thing is — an actor said he heard about it.

Eliza Ward: That's the whole gap. And it matters because — okay, Spiner's credible, he voiced Puck, he's not inventing this. But 'credible insider signal' and 'Disney Television Animation has greenlit a show' are two completely different sentences with completely different consequences for anyone following this.

Brian Reed: So what would actually move this from signal to confirmed — like, what are we watching for from Disney Kids and Family specifically?

Eliza Ward: An official press release from Disney Kids and Family, basically. But — hang on, that's actually not the thing that's bothering me right now. The thing that's bothering me is that people are treating Spiner's comment like it's the announcement. When there was already a reported Gargoyles project. In October 2023.

Brian Reed: The Dauberman project. Yeah — that's the part that nobody's addressing.

Eliza Ward: Hollywood Reporter and Variety both had it. Gary Dauberman, James Wan's production company, live-action, Disney+. That was a real trade story. And nobody knows what happened to it.

Brian Reed: No cancellation announcement. No 'it's still moving.' Just — silence for two and a half years, and then Spiner says there's an animated version and people act like that's the first Gargoyles news anyone's heard. I mean, Spiner even said explicitly these are different projects. Which means he knows both exist.

Eliza Ward: Right. And that actually makes it worse, not better.

Brian Reed: How so — like, is it possible this is intentional? Disney running parallel tracks, live-action and animated, hedge both bets? Because they do have Darkwing Duck in development too, that Purple Haze project, so it's not like they're doing this once.

Eliza Ward: Maybe. But — no source actually establishes that the live-action project is still active. It's not confirmed cancelled, it's not confirmed continuing. So we're either looking at a studio running two Gargoyles projects simultaneously with no public explanation of how they coexist, or the left hand genuinely doesn't know what the right hand greenlit. And I don't know which one is worse, actually.

Brian Reed: The part I don't get is — if it's intentional portfolio hedging, someone at Disney Kids and Family made that call. And they've said nothing about it. Which, given the June 2026 rebrand was specifically about organizational cohesion under Debra O'Connell, that's a weird look.

Eliza Ward: The Greg Weisman question is where this whole thing either holds together or falls apart — and that's a whole separate thread we should get to.

Brian Reed: The Weisman question is actually — I mean, it's not separate from the organizational chaos question, is it? Because if Greg Weisman is involved, that almost by definition means this is a continuation. He built the serialized continuity. The whole reason the original fanbase is still there thirty years later is that 1994-to-1997 run felt like a novel, not a cartoon.

Eliza Ward: And Michael Ouweleen said that out loud. At Annecy 2026. Cartoon Network president, fan research conducted in the past year — audiences prefer continuations and sequels over reboots. That's not fan sentiment on Reddit. That's a studio executive citing data.

Brian Reed: So the wrong call here has a measurable cost.

Eliza Ward: Look at The Proud Family: Louder and Prouder. Four seasons. July 29th, Season 4 premieres — and Disney confirms the same month it's the final season. That ran. It reached audiences. It still ended. So longevity doesn't protect you.

Brian Reed: Wait — they cancelled it while Season 4 was still airing?

Eliza Ward: Confirmed end, same window as the premiere. And then Adventure Time: Side Quests debuts, tops the streaming charts in July 2026, and gets a 20-episode Season 2 renewal within weeks. That's the track record. Perform, survive. Don't perform, done.

Brian Reed: So the creative choice — reboot versus continuation — isn't just about honoring the source material. It's actually a viewership bet. A rebooted Gargoyles loses the core audience on arrival, and then it has to build from scratch on a platform where Adventure Time just proved fast renewal is possible if the numbers are there.

Eliza Ward: Which is why Weisman's name is the first real signal. No announcement, no mention — that silence is data. Josh D'Amaro's One Disney framework means any greenlight has to survive a coherent strategic argument, not just nostalgia. Fan goodwill alone didn't save The Proud Family.

Brian Reed: So the thing to watch isn't Spiner saying more. It's whether Weisman's name appears anywhere near a Disney Kids and Family announcement — or conspicuously doesn't.

Eliza Ward: And the Mondo figure actually — okay, this is a small thing, but it landed for me this morning. Mondo announced a 1/6 scale Goliath. August 2026. Thirteen inches, fourteen-inch wingspan, limited edition. That's active commercial licensing on the IP right now. Not nostalgic catalog stuff — a new product timed to something.

Brian Reed: A figure announcement doesn't tell you who's in the writers' room though.

Eliza Ward: No, it doesn't. It tells you Disney thinks the IP is commercially viable right now. That's — I mean, it's consistent with a relaunch being prepared. It tells you nothing about whether Greg Weisman is anywhere near it.

Brian Reed: That's actually the whole thing, isn't it. Weisman created the original. The serialized continuity, the reason the fanbase held for thirty years — that's him. And his name hasn't come up once in any of this. Not from Spiner, not from Disney Kids and Family, not attached to the animated project anywhere. So either Disney hasn't decided, or they've decided and they're not saying. I genuinely don't know which one it is.

Eliza Ward: That's — yeah. That's where I land too. If his name surfaces near a Disney Kids and Family announcement, that's a revival. If it doesn't, we're watching an IP transaction with the Gargoyles logo on it.