Onpode
Cover art for Can the Knicks extend Miles McBride and other key starters with limited cap room?

Can the Knicks extend Miles McBride and other key starters with limited cap room?

September 1, 2026 · 9 min

Juniper Vale & Mark Delaney

Miles McBride earns just $3.96 million — one of the NBA's best value contracts — but the New York Knicks' committed payroll of roughly $205–$209 million leaves them only $3.3 million below the second apron, making a re-sign nearly impossible and a trade structurally awkward. The math, not the front office, is making this call.

The New York Knicks, as reigning NBA champions, enter the 2026-27 season navigating a series of interconnected roster and contract decisions shaped by tight salary cap constraints. The most prominently discussed player is Miles "Deuce" McBride, a guard currently on a three-year, $13 million extension signed in December 2023, with a 2026-27 salary of approximately $3.96 million.

0:008:31
Get the next episode on Sports

Follow it free — new episodes land in your feed.

Or make your own — any topic, in minutes

More Onpode episodes on Sports

About this episode

The New York Knicks signed Miles McBride to a three-year, $13 million extension in December 2023 — right after the Barrett and Quickley trade opened a rotation spot for him. By NBA standards, that contract was a steal. At $3.96 million for a starting-caliber two-way guard, it's genuinely one of the best value deals in the league. And yet, heading into the 2026–27 season, the Knicks may lose him for nothing. This episode works through the specific financial logic that creates that outcome. New York's committed payroll sits at roughly $205 to $209 million across nine players — about $3.3 million under the second apron, with two roster spots unfilled. McBride's bargain salary is too small to fix that margin and too good to simply release. Meanwhile, any rival team can wait until July and offer him multiples of his current deal. His value as a trade chip is real but precarious: the longer the Knicks wait, the closer that chip gets to expiring in their hand. The episode also maps what surrounds the McBride decision — a potential Karl-Anthony Towns restructure (a hypothetical raised by The Athletic, not a confirmed negotiation), a pressing Josh Hart decision, and a backcourt depth chart that is already one of the smallest in the league. Landry Shamet and Tyler Kolek are fine. They're not Miles McBride. The episode sits in that discomfort rather than tidying it up — because the honest answer is that the math may have already made this call before the front office had the chance to.

Frequently asked

Will the Knicks re-sign Miles McBride?

Re-signing Miles McBride looks unlikely. The Athletic's James L. Edwards III said McBride's departure 'feels like the likely outcome based on history' without a preseason extension. The Knicks' payroll of roughly $205–$209 million leaves only $3.3 million of space below the second apron — not enough to offer him a market-rate deal.

What is Miles McBride's current salary?

Miles McBride's salary is $3.96 million, the final year of a three-year, $13 million extension he signed in December 2023 with the New York Knicks. That figure is far below his market value as a two-way starting guard, making him one of the most underpaid players in the NBA heading into 2026–27.

Why can't the Knicks extend Miles McBride if he's so cheap?

McBride's $3.96 million salary is far below what he'd command as a free agent. The Knicks' committed payroll of $205–$209 million sits just $3.3 million under the NBA's second apron, a hard spending ceiling with severe roster penalties. Offering McBride a fair extension would push New York over that threshold.

Could the Knicks trade Miles McBride instead of losing him for nothing?

Trading Miles McBride is complicated because his $3.96 million salary is so low that salary-matching in a trade becomes structurally awkward. Rival teams can simply wait until July and offer him four times that amount in free agency, reducing the Knicks' leverage to extract meaningful value in any deal.

How do Karl-Anthony Towns and Josh Hart's contracts affect the Knicks' cap situation?

Karl-Anthony Towns carries a $61 million player option for 2027–28, and Josh Hart faces a reported contract decision that must be resolved soon. Both situations directly affect the Knicks' second-apron math, which is why McBride's $3.96 million salary — though minimal — still can't solve the team's structural payroll problem.

Grounded in 12 sources
The Knicks’ next moves: Plans for Miles McBride? Extensions for key starters? - The Athletic · nytimes.com
Knicks Insider Predicts Championship Guard Will Be Traded Before Deadline - Yahoo Sports · sports.yahoo.com
Knicks Have a Big Josh Hart Decision Coming Fast - Yahoo Sports · sports.yahoo.com
What's next for the Knicks? Why the champs can run it back with this roster - CBS Sports · cbssports.com
Knicks Face Tough Decision on Karl-Anthony Towns' Contract Extension - Fantasy Nerds · fantasynerds.com
Knicks Have a Big Josh Hart Decision Coming Fast - Last Word On Basketball · lastwordonsports.com
Can Knicks run it back? The roster decisions facing the NBA champs · nydailynews.com
Knicks Domino Effects: What if Jalen Brunson stayed in ... · postingandtoasting.com
Knicks sit $3.3M below second apron with two roster spots open per Blake Silverman report. · x.ai
Knicks prioritize second-apron avoidance over third-string center additions. · x.ai
James L. Edwards III Athletic mailbag covers Knicks next moves on Miles McBride extension and roster flexibility. · x.ai
Knicks could trade Miles McBride following new extension report. · x.ai
Read transcript

Mark Delaney: Juniper, hey — uh, I spent part of my week just trying to figure out why a team would trade away someone they're underpaying. Like, that feels like the wrong direction?

Juniper Vale: You're already there. That's exactly where we're going today — Miles McBride and the New York Knicks.

Mark Delaney: Because his salary is $3.96 million. Which, for a guy playing starting minutes as a two-way guard, is — I mean, that's nothing, right?

Juniper Vale: It's genuinely one of the best value contracts in the NBA. And James L. Edwards III — writing in The Athletic — said that without a preseason agreement, McBride leaving feels like the likely outcome based on history.

Mark Delaney: Wait, seriously? They'd trade the cheap guy?

Juniper Vale: Because the Knicks' committed payroll is already sitting at roughly $205 to $209 million — nine players — and they're only about $3.3 million under the second apron. McBride's salary is so low it barely closes that gap. So what do you actually gain by keeping him if you can't afford to re-sign him?

Mark Delaney: Oh. The bargain is too small to fix anything and too good to just give away.

Juniper Vale: That's the trap, yeah.

Mark Delaney: Okay but — wait, that's the part I keep getting stuck on. Like, imagine your landlord has you locked into rent that's way below market. That's great for you right now. But when the lease ends? They either pay market rate or watch you walk. And if they want to sell the building, nobody wants to buy just your unit because it's priced weird compared to everything around it. That's McBride's contract in a nutshell.

Juniper Vale: That's actually exactly right. The core issue is: his $3.96 million salary is so far below what he'd command as a free agent that salary-matching in a trade becomes structurally awkward. Any rival team can just — wait him out and offer him four times that in July.

Mark Delaney: So why didn't the Knicks just extend him before the deadline?

Juniper Vale: The reporting is genuinely a bit fuzzy on the timing. But here's what we know: they didn't extend him. And by not extending him before that deadline, they preserved his trade eligibility — which sounds smart — but it also left him heading into 2026-27 as a free agent after the season unless they get a preseason deal done.

Mark Delaney: Which James L. Edwards III at The Athletic basically said good luck with.

Juniper Vale: He said departure 'feels like' the likely outcome 'based on history.' Those were his words. And I mean — he covers this team. That's not a throwaway.

Mark Delaney: So the Knicks get — uh, they get a trade chip that's hard to trade, or a free agent they probably can't re-sign. That's a rough spot to have maneuvered yourself into.

Juniper Vale: And remember he signed that three-year, $13 million extension in December 2023 — right after the Barrett and Quickley trade cleared room for him in the rotation. That was the moment. The Knicks got a steal, and now the clock on that steal is almost up.

Mark Delaney: The discount ran out before they figured out what to do with it.

Juniper Vale: But the discount running out — that's actually the cleaner part of this problem. Here's what gets weird: even if Leon Rose trades McBride tomorrow, the Knicks are still staring at that second apron ceiling. Because picture him — it's late August, he's got the roster spreadsheet open — he moves McBride, pockets the $3.96 million, and the needle barely moves. Blake Silverman reported they're $3.3 million below the second apron with two roster spots still open. So you trade the guy, save almost exactly that margin, and you're still brushing the ceiling. Towns and Hart's numbers haven't changed at all.

Mark Delaney: Wait — so the math basically cancels itself out?

Juniper Vale: Almost exactly. And the Knicks have been so disciplined about this that they declined to add even a third-string center — a backup center — because of apron concerns. That's how tight the margin is. You're not adding a guy who'll play eight minutes a night because of a rule.

Mark Delaney: Man, that's — uh, that's a strange place to be. You're a championship-contending team and you can't fill out the bottom of your roster.

Juniper Vale: And meanwhile Towns has a $61 million player option sitting there for 2027-28. The Athletic raised this hypothetical — and I want to be clear it's a hypothetical, not a confirmed negotiation — of Towns taking a three-year, $135 million extension instead. That's about $45 million a year. Which would actually restructure some of this math. But none of that's resolved. So right now Leon Rose is juggling Towns's situation and Josh Hart — there's reportedly a big Hart decision coming fast too — and McBride is kind of caught in the middle of all of it.

Mark Delaney: The Hart thing — I didn't realize that was also active at the same time. That's a lot of fires.

Juniper Vale: Every one of those decisions affects the apron math, and the apron math affects every one of those decisions. It's circular. Which is — I mean, that's why McBride's cheap salary almost doesn't matter. It's not enough to create real room, but it's not zero either, so he's useful mainly as a trade chip rather than a cap solution.

Mark Delaney: Okay but — isn't that something? Like, a trade chip's not nothing. You package McBride, you get back something useful.

Juniper Vale: You'd think. But that's actually where this gets worse — and we'll get into why banking on McBride as a trade chip might leave the Knicks with nothing at all. Because there's a version of this where the chip expires in your hand.

Mark Delaney: The chip expires in your hand — okay, so walk me through what that actually looks like. Like, concretely.

Juniper Vale: Picture Leon Rose in October, training camp is running, and McBride is still on the roster — no extension done, no trade done. Every week that passes, his market value as a trade piece stays the same but his value to the Knicks keeps getting fuzzier. And if Towns doesn't restructure and Hart's deal doesn't come in under budget, the Knicks breach the second apron anyway. At that point McBride's gone and they still blew through the ceiling.

Mark Delaney: So they gave up a two-way starter and got — nothing. Not cap room, not a replacement.

Juniper Vale: And the backcourt replacement problem is real. Brunson, McBride, Alvarado — all listed at six-two or shorter. That's already one of the smallest backcourts in the league. You don't just swap in a body.

Mark Delaney: And the guys behind him are — uh, Landry Shamet and Tyler Kolek, right? I mean, that's not the same thing.

Juniper Vale: Not even close. McBride came in as the 36th pick in 2021 — a defensive specialist, basically a project. He built himself into a dependable two-way guard. Shamet and Kolek are fine depth pieces, but neither carries that profile.

Mark Delaney: Which — man, that's actually the human part of this that gets me. He did the work, earned the spot, and now the Knicks are keeping him in limbo because the numbers around him don't cooperate.

Juniper Vale: And that limbo has a cost. You know — at what point does 'we're keeping our options open' just become paralysis dressed up as strategy?

Mark Delaney: Yeah, and I don't — uh, I don't have a clean answer for that. But I think that's the question Leon Rose actually has to sit with.

Juniper Vale: And that's actually the part that matters in all of this. James L. Edwards III didn't say McBride is gone — he said it *feels like* the likely outcome based on history. That word 'feels' is doing a lot of work. The Knicks haven't made the move yet. But the $205 to $209 million sitting on nine players basically made the decision for them before they sat down to make it.

Mark Delaney: Yeah — and that's the part that kind of stuck with me through all of this. It looks like a choice. It might not be.

Juniper Vale: That's where I land too. Leon Rose can call it strategy. And maybe it is. But when your margin is $3.3 million under the apron and you still have two spots to fill — I mean, the math was always going to make this call, not the front office.

Mark Delaney: Uh — yeah. That's a rough thing to absorb, honestly. You build something real and then the ceiling just kind of... descends on you.

Juniper Vale: Good talk. I'm glad we actually sat in the discomfort of it rather than tidying it up.

Can the Knicks extend Miles McBride and other key starters with limited cap room? · Onpode