Ben Okonkwo: You look like you've been sitting on something.
Marcus Vale: Honestly? Yeah. I've been staring at a polling number since this morning and I can't decide if it's the most important data point in British politics or a correlation dressed up as a cause.
Ben Okonkwo: Okay, what's the number.
Marcus Vale: Eighty-one to forty. Youth pride in Britain. 2004 to now. Rafe Heydel-Mankoo — New Culture Forum, co-edited Burke's Peerage, interviewed by Peta Credlin on Sky News Australia last week — he calls it a fifty percent collapse in twenty years and says the cause is Britain stopping celebrating Western culture and Western civilisation. Prioritising minority cultures, he says, at the expense of what he calls the one prevailing culture.
Ben Okonkwo: Right. So — to be precise — his causal arrow runs from cultural policy choices directly to identity outcomes.
Marcus Vale: Which is either the right diagnosis or it's missing something much bigger. That's what I want to find out.
Ben Okonkwo: Now, the youth number is the headline, but the broader slide is actually more interesting to me. It's not just eighteen-to-twenty-fives. Pride in Britain's history — across all ages — fell from roughly eighty-five percent in the nineties to sixty-four percent today. General 'proud to be British' sentiment, same thing: eighty-six to sixty-four. That's a society-wide shift, not a generational quirk.
Marcus Vale: But that same window — 2004 to now — that's austerity, Brexit, COVID, three prime ministers imploding. Isn't the causal story already crowded?
Ben Okonkwo: Yes. And Heydel-Mankoo doesn't really address those confounds. He — I mean, his argument is about cultural relativism as a policy driver: institutions treating all cultures as equally worth promoting, so British Western heritage gets actively deprioritised. Education, media, public life. That's his mechanism. But isolating that from Brexit fallout or a decade of austerity? He doesn't show you that work.
Marcus Vale: Right, so where does the immigration argument fit in?
Ben Okonkwo: He cites over ten million foreign-born residents in the UK — roughly half arrived in the last decade. And the claim is that newcomers are being integrated into a cultural narrative that's predominantly self-critical. So both existing residents and new arrivals receive, in his framing, a diminished account of British civilisational achievement. It's a compounding problem in his model. Actually — wait — that's where super-diversity enters: too many source countries simultaneously, social fabric fraying.
Marcus Vale: The messaging failure claim I'll grant him. But the causal arrow still isn't proven.
Marcus Vale: Germany and France. Walk me through that.
Ben Okonkwo: Right, so — this is the thing that actually cracks the causal story open. Both Germany and France increased their cultural celebration investment over this same twenty-year window. State funding, national curriculum, the whole apparatus. And youth pride in both countries still declined measurably. So if the mechanism is 'celebrate more, pride rises' — that experiment ran, and it didn't work.
Marcus Vale: That's — yeah. That's a real problem for Heydel-Mankoo.
Ben Okonkwo: It suggests the variable doing the work isn't celebration infrastructure. And then there's the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in London — Michael Shellenberger on the advisory board, arguing about threats to Western civilisation's institutional pillars. Heydel-Mankoo's argument slots directly into that project. Which is — I mean, that's not automatically wrong, but it does raise the question of whether the framing is being shaped by an organised transatlantic agenda rather than, you know, emerging organically from British domestic debate.
Marcus Vale: And Sky News Australia as the primary platform. That's a data point by itself — who's the actual audience here?
Ben Okonkwo: Exactly. Peta Credlin's show amplifying this to an Anglosphere conservative audience — that's a specific epistemic environment.
Marcus Vale: And the 'two millennia' immigration claim — more immigration in twenty years than the previous two thousand? Basically unverifiable. Like, what's the like-for-like unit? Roman legions? Vikings? He's reaching for rhetorical scale, not — actually, that's the whole problem with 'prevailing Western culture' too. Which version? 1945? 1850? Because the prescription completely changes depending on the answer, and he never pins it down.
Ben Okonkwo: And that's — I mean, that's where I land on Heydel-Mankoo, actually. The data point he's reading is real. Forty percent. The number is real. But a number is not a mechanism. If a 27-year-old cannot afford housing and cannot envision a stable future, no amount of institutional celebration of Western civilisation reverses that. And the Germany-France finding tells you the celebration variable isn't doing what he thinks it is. So — the withdrawal from affirmative national storytelling might itself be a symptom. Of the same fracture that's producing the pride collapse. Not the cause of it.
Marcus Vale: You can't narrative your way out of material failure. But I'll give him this much — institutions do shape identity over time. You can't fully dismiss that.
Ben Okonkwo: No. That part I'll grant. The harder question — what actually rebuilds pride in a generation that's been let down on multiple fronts simultaneously — that one's still open.