Onpode
Cover art for Fed Chair Kevin Warsh just signaled possible 2026 rate hikes — repricing bond markets overnight

Fed Chair Kevin Warsh just signaled possible 2026 rate hikes — repricing bond markets overnight

June 25, 2026 · 5 min

Ryan Castillo & Jordan Hale

At Kevin Warsh's first FOMC meeting on June 17, 2026, nine of 19 Fed officials penciled in at least one rate hike — up from zero in March. Warsh simultaneously eliminated the dot plot, sending 10-year Treasury yields toward 4.5% the same day, repricing bond markets without a single rate move.

Kevin Warsh was sworn in as Federal Reserve Chair on May 22, 2026, succeeding Jerome Powell. His tenure began amid rising inflationary pressures driven primarily by a geopolitical conflict involving Iran and disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz, which pushed Brent and WTI crude prices to approximately $90 per barrel in Q2 2026.

0:005:10
Make your own on Onpode

Describe any topic. Hear it in minutes.

More Onpode episodes on Finance

About this episode

Kevin Warsh's first Federal Reserve meeting as chair produced a result that's hard to parse on the surface: rates held steady, and markets got more volatile. This episode works through why. The immediate trigger was a shift in the Fed's own internal forecasts — nine of 19 FOMC officials penciled in at least one 2026 rate hike, up from zero in March. That move coincided with Warsh announcing the end of the dot plot, the forward guidance tool that has anchored market expectations for years. Ten-year Treasury yields pushed toward 4.5% the same day. The episode then gets into the harder question — whether any of this tightening signal is actually warranted. May's headline CPI was 4.2%, but core inflation ran at just 0.2% month-over-month. The difference is almost entirely energy, driven by Iran's disruption of the Strait of Hormuz and oil near ninety dollars. That raises a genuine policy dilemma: raising rates to fight a war-driven price spike is a different calculation than fighting demand-driven inflation. But the counterargument — that elevated energy costs could trigger second-round wage inflation — is real and the episode takes it seriously. Threading through everything is a harder political question about what it means that the Treasury Secretary applauded reduced Fed transparency, and what Warsh's credibility looks like if the oil shock fades and he never pulls the trigger.

Frequently asked

Is the Fed going to raise interest rates in 2026?

As of June 17, 2026, nine of 19 FOMC officials projected at least one rate hike before year-end — a sharp reversal from March, when zero officials held that view. The Fed held rates at 3.50–3.75% but the hawkish shift drove 10-year Treasury yields toward 4.5%.

What did Kevin Warsh do with the Fed dot plot?

Fed Chair Kevin Warsh eliminated the dot plot — the quarterly chart showing officials' interest rate projections — at his first FOMC press conference on June 17, 2026. Markets responded with immediate volatility: 10-year Treasury yields pushed toward 4.5% and gold fell below $4,000 the same day.

Why are bond yields rising if the Fed hasn't raised rates?

Bond markets repriced in anticipation of Fed rate hikes after Kevin Warsh's hawkish June 2026 FOMC meeting, sending 10-year Treasury yields toward 4.5% without any actual rate increase. Warsh also dropped forward guidance tools, leaving investors to price in worst-case scenarios rather than rely on Fed projections.

What is driving inflation in 2026 — is it really a Fed problem?

May 2026 headline CPI of 4.2% was largely driven by an energy shock after Iran disrupted the Strait of Hormuz, pushing oil to roughly $90 a barrel. Core CPI, which excludes energy and better reflects domestic demand, came in at just 0.2% month-over-month — cooler than expected.

What happens to Warsh's credibility if oil prices fall and he never hikes rates?

If a preliminary Washington-Tehran peace deal eases Strait of Hormuz disruptions and oil retreats from $90, headline inflation could cool without any Fed action. Bond markets have already tightened significantly in anticipation. Analysts question whether Warsh's inflation-hawk positioning would be seen as prescient caution or a credibility-damaging bluff.

Grounded in 12 sources
There are early signs of renewed labor market strength during Iran war - Axios · axios.com
The first inflation report under new Fed chief Kevin Warsh is out — and it's not good - CBS News · cbsnews.com
Fed's Kevin Warsh: FOMC believes labor markets are stable - CNBC · cnbc.com
Dollar rides high on Fed rate-hike bets - CNBC · cnbc.com
Kevin Warsh has done enough to prove he isn't a lackey of the White House: Strategist - CNBC · cnbc.com
Markets are set for a much more hawkish Warsh Fed than expected · cnbc.com
Gold tumbles below $4,000 over worries of Fed rate hikes - Yahoo Finance · finance.yahoo.com
Kevin Warsh's tenure as Fed governor shaped by inflation concerns, central bank credibility · finance.yahoo.com
NY Fed official plays down new FOMC language on ample reserves system - Reuters · reuters.com
U.S. Treasure Secretary applauds Warsh’s plan to reduce Fed guidance - The Globe and Mail · theglobeandmail.com
Fed holds rates steady as Warsh faces inflation test - The Washington Post · washingtonpost.com
What to Expect From Kevin Warsh's Fed in the First 100 Days · cfr.org
Read transcript

Ryan Castillo: The number that matters here is nine. Not 4.2, not 4.5 — nine.

Jordan Hale: Wait — nine what?

Ryan Castillo: Nine of 19 FOMC officials, at the June 17th meeting — Kevin Warsh's first as Federal Reserve Chair — penciled in at least one rate hike before the end of the year. In March? Zero officials did that.

Jordan Hale: That's — okay, so in the span of the Iran war starting, the Strait of Hormuz getting choked off, oil going to like ninety dollars — nine people flipped.

Ryan Castillo: Right. And simultaneously — same press conference, June 17th — Warsh announces he's discontinuing the dot plot entirely. Fed holds at 3.50 to 3.75, but he yanks the one tool that tells markets where rates are heading. Ten-year Treasuries immediately push toward 4.5%.

Jordan Hale: So he held rates and somehow made everything more volatile. That's — yeah, that's genuinely wild.

Jordan Hale: But here's what I keep getting stuck on — like, the headline number, 4.2%, that's not really a demand story. That's a war story. The Bureau of Labor Statistics report, May 2026, energy is doing almost all the heavy lifting there because Iran disrupted the Strait of Hormuz and oil went to ninety dollars. It's like — you know the thermostat analogy? The Fed is a thermostat. It raises rates when the room gets too hot from everyone cranking up the heat. But this time the heat is coming from a broken window, not from people turning up the dial themselves.

Ryan Castillo: Core CPI. 0.2% month-over-month in May. That's the number that actually reflects domestic demand. Cooler than expected.

Jordan Hale: Right, exactly — so the thermostat isn't even reading the room wrong, the thermometer is broken because a war is blowing cold air through a hole in the wall.

Ryan Castillo: Mm. But Neel Kashkari's point is real and I don't think you can just wave it away — if oil stays elevated, workers start demanding higher wages to cover their gas bills, and now you've got a supply shock that metastasizes into a demand problem. April CPI was already 3.8%, up from 3.3% in March. The trend was accelerating before the May print even landed.

Jordan Hale: So the broken window eventually makes everyone turn up their own heat.

Ryan Castillo: That's actually the split. Core versus headline — that gap is load-bearing. If core stays at 0.2, Warsh is fighting a ghost. If Kashkari's second-round risks materialize and core starts climbing, then the nine officials penciling in hikes weren't overreacting — they were early.

Ryan Castillo: The take that's circulating is that Warsh killed the dot plot to bring discipline — less noise, cleaner signals. That take is wrong. Yields went to 4.5% the same day he announced it.

Jordan Hale: No, I don't buy that.

Ryan Castillo: Which part?

Jordan Hale: That it was ever about calming markets. Like — wait, actually — Scott Bessent went on CNBC and publicly applauded the guidance reduction. The Treasury Secretary. Trump's Treasury Secretary. If the White House is cheering the Fed for being less transparent, I mean, is that really about volatility? Or is it about... giving Warsh room to move without having to defend it on a chart nobody's publishing anymore?

Ryan Castillo: That's exactly the question. Bessent praised it, Trump nominated Warsh — and Warsh's first act is eliminating the one commitment device that constrains unilateral movement. That's not data dependence. That's institutional cover dressed as reform.

Jordan Hale: Or — and I'm genuinely not sure here — maybe Warsh is just being honest that the dot plot was always fiction? Like, zero officials penciled in hikes in March, nine did two months later because a war happened. That's not a forecast, that's a mood ring.

Ryan Castillo: Gold below four thousand, dollar at multi-month highs — markets weren't freed by the ambiguity. They panicked into it. That's the correction.

Jordan Hale: But here's what's actually keeping me up about this — like, there's a preliminary peace agreement between Washington and Tehran. Strait of Hormuz concerns are easing. If oil falls back from ninety dollars, headline inflation cools, core stays at 0.2... Warsh may never pull the trigger on a single hike. And yet bond markets are already at 4.5%, the dollar's surged, gold's below four thousand. The tightening already happened. In asset prices. Without him doing anything.

Ryan Castillo: That's the live wire. Warsh said at the June 17th press conference that inflation has run above the 2% target for more than five years. Five years. That's the mandate he's wrapping himself in. But if the oil shock reverses and he never hikes — markets repriced for nothing, households braced for nothing.

Jordan Hale: And that's the thing I genuinely don't know the answer to — if Warsh trained markets to expect hikes, spent months building this whole inflation-hawk identity, and then never delivers because the war cools off and the numbers cooperate... does that protect his credibility? Or does it destroy it?

Fed Chair Kevin Warsh just signaled possible 2026 rate hikes — repricing bond markets overnight · Onpode