Onpode
Cover art for SpaceX is struggling to maintain IPO gains two weeks later, failing to lift the broader space economy

SpaceX is struggling to maintain IPO gains two weeks later, failing to lift the broader space economy

June 27, 2026 · 4 min

Zara Reyes & Megan Skiendel

SpaceX (SPCX) peaked at $225.64 within days of its record $75 billion IPO on June 12, 2026, then fell roughly 16% in a single session to around $153 — erasing most IPO gains. Analysts at Fundstrat argue SpaceX's vertical integration means no value flows to the broader space supply chain, making the 'sector play' narrative misleading.

SpaceX completed its initial public offering on June 12, 2026, on the Nasdaq, raising approximately $75 billion at an IPO price of $135 per share — surpassing Saudi Aramco's 2019 record to become the largest IPO in history. The debut day saw shares open at roughly $160.95, surge intraday to as high as $176, and close near $161, a gain of approximately 19%.

0:004:14
Make your own on Onpode

Describe any topic. Hear it in minutes.

More Onpode episodes on SpaceX

About this episode

On June 12th, 2026, SpaceX went public in the largest IPO in history — $75 billion raised, a $2 trillion intraday market cap, and Elon Musk crossing the trillion-dollar net worth threshold by close. The coverage declared the space economy had finally arrived as an asset class. This episode argues that was wrong from the start. The spike was real: SPCX gained 40–50% in under a week. So was the reversal — a 16% single-day drop, three consecutive losing sessions, and a 23% drawdown from the peak. The episode traces why: retail piled in on the Musk-as-trillionaire narrative, not on a genuine read of the business. And Fundstrat's analysis explains why the 'rising tide for space' framing was structurally broken — SpaceX's vertical integration means value stays inside the company. The broader space supply chain doesn't benefit. But the most interesting part is what got buried. During the roadshow, Gwynne Shotwell announced Starlink's pivot to direct-to-consumer mobile. It was hiding in plain sight inside a capital raise, and almost nobody led with it. Meanwhile, Nasdaq 100 inclusion means passive funds are forced buyers regardless of whether that DTC pivot actually works. What a lot of retail investors thought they bought and what they actually own may turn out to be two very different things. The lockup expiry will be clarifying.

Frequently asked

Why is SpaceX stock dropping after its IPO?

SpaceX (SPCX) fell roughly 16% in a single trading session starting June 22, 2026, after surging nearly 40–50% from its IPO price in under a week. Analysts cite both macro headwinds — the Nasdaq was down 4.6% that week — and an unwinding of the retail-driven Musk narrative that inflated the initial pop.

Did the SpaceX IPO lift other space stocks?

No. Fundstrat analysts argue SpaceX's vertical integration — designing, manufacturing, launching, and operating entirely in-house — means value is captured inside the company and nothing flows out to the broader space supply chain. The 'sector play' framing from IPO coverage does not hold up under that analysis.

What is SpaceX's stock price and market cap after the post-IPO sell-off?

After three consecutive down sessions beginning June 22, 2026, and a roughly 16% single-day drop, SPCX fell from its $225.64 peak to approximately $153 — a significant retreat from the $2 trillion intraday market cap reached on the IPO date of June 12, 2026.

What is Starlink's direct-to-consumer mobile plan and why does it matter for SpaceX investors?

During SpaceX's IPO roadshow, CEO Gwynne Shotwell announced Starlink would expand from B2B and government contracts into direct-to-consumer mobile service. Analysts describe this as a platform pivot buried inside the capital raise — and potentially the real valuation story, largely missed because IPO coverage focused on Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire.

Is SpaceX stock being added to the Nasdaq 100?

SpaceX (SPCX) was added to or set for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100, according to the Onpode analysis. This creates structural, passive-fund buying pressure — index funds are required to hold SPCX regardless of fundamentals — demand that is entirely disconnected from whether Starlink's direct-to-consumer mobile pivot actually succeeds.

Grounded in 12 sources
SpaceX Index Era Sets Up Clash Among Shorts and Passive Billions - Bloomberg · bloomberg.com
The Club's top 10 things to watch in the stock market Friday - CNBC · cnbc.com
SpaceX stock tanks 16%, extending slump following post-IPO rally · cnbc.com
SpaceX (SPCX) IPO: Live updates - CNBC · cnbc.com
SpaceX stock tumbles 16.4%, shaving off most IPO gains since debut - Yahoo Finance · finance.yahoo.com
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SPCX) - Yahoo Finance · finance.yahoo.com
Why SpaceX has yet to lift the space economy: Fundstrat · finance.yahoo.com
Gwynne Shotwell reveals Starlink direct-to-consumer mobile plans in IPO roadshow · ft.com
The initial SpaceX frenzy is cooling off — but a new wave of cash is waiting to strike - MarketWatch · marketwatch.com
SpaceX set to join Nasdaq 100, paving way for wave of passive buying - Reuters · reuters.com
SpaceX shares surge after world's biggest IPO, sending its value ... · reuters.com
Industrial policy for the final frontier: Governing growth in the emerging space economy | Brookings · brookings.edu
Read transcript

Zara Reyes: June 12th, 2026 — I want to just name what actually happened, because the framing in the press got it wrong immediately.

Megan Skiendel: How so?

Zara Reyes: Every headline was 'SpaceX validates space as an asset class.' Largest IPO ever, seventy-five billion, beats Saudi Aramco's 2019 record, market cap hits two trillion intraday, Elon Musk is literally a trillionaire by close. And the coverage treated all of that as — like, proof that the space economy arrived.

Megan Skiendel: Right, the sector story.

Zara Reyes: Which is — no. Think about it this way: if you buy a ticket to see your favorite artist headline a festival, you're not investing in the music industry. You're buying the show. Retail took twenty to thirty percent of the SPCX float on Nasdaq because Musk-as-trillionaire was the headline. That's the product. The rocket company was the venue.

Megan Skiendel: And Facebook's 2012 IPO had roughly that same retail energy — five hundred million shares on day one.

Megan Skiendel: But here's where I pump the brakes. Because the market already ran that experiment and got an answer. SPCX hit $225.64 on June 16th — that's basically a forty-to-fifty percent gain from IPO price in under a week. And then, starting June 22nd, three consecutive sessions down. One of those days was a sixteen percent single-day drop. Back to $153. That's not turbulence — that's the narrative tax unwinding in real time.

Zara Reyes: Sixteen percent in one session?

Megan Skiendel: One session. And look — the broader Nasdaq was down 4.6% for that same week ending June 26th, second-largest weekly loss in a year, so there's macro headwind you can't ignore. But honestly, that doesn't let SPCX off the hook. The macro explains maybe half of it.

Zara Reyes: So you're saying the sell-off is — wait, is this fundamentals catching up or just the Musk story losing oxygen?

Megan Skiendel: Both, probably. And Fundstrat published analysis on June 26th that names the structural reason. Their economic strategist's argument is essentially: SpaceX's vertical integration — meaning they design, manufacture, launch, operate, all in-house — means value gets captured *inside* the company. Nothing flows out to the broader space supply chain. So the 'sector play' framing your press was selling? Fundstrat is saying there isn't one.

Zara Reyes: Lowkey that tracks. You're not buying the space economy — you're buying a closed loop.

Zara Reyes: But wait — there's something that got completely buried in the closed-loop story. Gwynne Shotwell, during the roadshow, announced Starlink's direct-to-consumer mobile plans. Like, not quietly. During the capital raise.

Megan Skiendel: Oh, honestly — that's the valuation story nobody led with.

Zara Reyes: Right? Because Starlink moving from B2B, government contracts, into direct-to-consumer mobile — that's a platform pivot. Hidden inside a capital raise. Shotwell announced it and every headline the next morning was still Musk-as-trillionaire.

Megan Skiendel: And then layer the Nasdaq 100 inclusion on top of that. Passive funds don't care about the Starlink pivot — they're forced-buying SPCX regardless. That's structural demand completely disconnected from whether the DTC mobile play actually works.

Zara Reyes: So — okay, picture this. Twenty-eight-year-old in Austin, bought SPCX on June 12th. She thinks she's making a sector bet on commercial space. But what she actually owns is... a Starlink DTC mobile position, propped up by index flows she never modeled.

Megan Skiendel: She doesn't even know the passive bid exists.

Zara Reyes: Which is lowkey where my hot take gets its partial win — the brand event did create something real. Just not what she thought she bought.

Megan Skiendel: And that's actually the Amazon parallel Fundstrat is dancing around but won't quite say out loud. Critics were right about the mechanism — one platform vacuums up all the oxygen, ecosystem stays subordinate — and they were wrong about the outcome every single time. Amazon captured everything and the stock went up anyway. So the question isn't whether SpaceX is eating the space economy. It's whether that's actually a problem. Or just Tuesday.

Zara Reyes: Fine. I'll admit the hot take needed a Starlink footnote.

Megan Skiendel: When the lockup expires and passive Nasdaq 100 inflows normalize, we'll finally get an answer — and retail will find out what they actually bought.